DisclosedConsumer transparency infrastructure · US & Canada

Index

Publishers

15 publishers carry a report card. They are grouped by the state of the card, because a publisher whose correlation cannot exist and a publisher we have too few articles for are different situations and a single ranked list would flatten them into one.

A further 7 are named at the foot of this page with no figures beside them, because no working contact route to them was found and the right of reply could not be given.

Not scored — below the article threshold

A qualifying article is one with enough priced picks, enough rated picks, and enough rate coverage for a per-article correlation to exist. This publisher has some, but fewer than the threshold. The count is shown below with the reason each article was excluded. Nothing about the correlation is shown, because the threshold is what decides whether it may be shown at all.

PublisherMonetizationDisclosure deficiencyMedian ρQualifying nRate coverageArticlesGenerated
bgr.com78.1%0.292not published—74.6%182026-09-17
cnet.com98.2%0.250not published—58.0%292026-09-17
cyberinsider.com78.2%0.000not published—53.1%62026-09-17
electricteeth.com70.8%0.000not published—94.4%42026-09-17
nymag.com95.3%0.649not published—70.6%472026-09-17
nytimes.com84.0%0.250not published—53.1%252026-09-17
powertoolsinsider.com77.4%0.000not published—100.0%42026-09-17
tomsguide.com58.5%0.250not published—59.9%102026-09-17
top10vpn.com41.0%1.000not published—35.6%72026-09-17

Not scored — no payout variation to correlate

This is not a data gap and must not be read as one. In every article, every pick we can price carries the SAME commission rate, and a rank correlation against a constant is undefined. More articles of the same shape would not change that. It is a fact about which merchants this publisher links to, not about how much we have collected.

PublisherMonetizationDisclosure deficiencyMedian ρQualifying nRate coverageArticlesGenerated
airpurifierfirst.com100.0%0.000not published—100.0%32026-09-17
hostingstep.com100.0%0.000not published—60.0%12026-09-17
rtings.com100.0%0.000not published—100.0%232026-09-17
thegreatreviewer.com100.0%0.250not published—100.0%62026-09-17

Not scored — monetization not established

No pick on this publisher carries a link we can establish is affiliate. That is a statement about what this method observed, not a statement that the publisher earns nothing: display advertising, sponsored placement paid outside an affiliate network, subscriptions and licensing are all outside what this method can see. The number of articles sampled is shown beside the claim.

PublisherMonetizationDisclosure deficiencyMedian ρQualifying nRate coverageArticlesGenerated
security.org0.0%0.000not published—not measured72026-09-17
standingdeskpicks.com0.0%1.000not published—not measured22026-09-17

Not published — we could not reach these publishers

Every publisher measured here is written to before anything about them is published, and the seven days run from a delivery rather than from an attempt. No working contact route was found for these, so no window opened, and a window that never opened cannot expire. Being hard to write to is not consent. We hold measurements for each of them and are not showing them.

This is our gap, not their silence, and it is not a finding about any of them.

PublisherRoute attemptedWhat is published
adorama.comnone foundNothing measured. The reason, as ours.
robovacguide.comnone foundNothing measured. The reason, as ours.
safetydetectives.comnone foundNothing measured. The reason, as ours.
techgearlab.comnone foundNothing measured. The reason, as ours.
vacuumwars.comsite contact formNothing measured. The reason, as ours.
websiteplanet.comsite contact formNothing measured. The reason, as ours.
youtube.comsite contact formNothing measured. The reason, as ours.

Reading this table